Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 103
  1. #21
    JackTenSuited is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2004
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 334 Times in 207 Posts

    Default

    yep I'm sure it will, hopefully people will express their views at the upcoming affiliate conference too

  2. #22
    thebookiesoffers is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    November 2009
    Location
    Leicester, UK
    Posts
    3,225
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 1,764 Times in 1,009 Posts

    Default

    i don't usually mind quota's that start out on a standard rev share say 25% or 30% and then reward really successful affiliates with a higher % but what ladbrokes are suggesting is crap

  3. #23
    JackTenSuited is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2004
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 334 Times in 207 Posts

    Default

    not only is it a poor % but also punishes those that have been promoting ladbrokes over the years and built up a decent player base.

  4. #24
    sweelinck is offline New Member
    Join Date
    January 2012
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thebookiesoffers View Post
    i don't usually mind quota's that start out on a standard rev share say 25% or 30% and then reward really successful affiliates with a higher % but what ladbrokes are suggesting is crap
    Agreed, 15% and 20% are absolutely disgraceful percentages, they shouldn't even be there. And what makes matters even worse is there's huge jump in required depositors just to get a below par revenue share. I reckon less than 1% will ever get there. Don't get me started on the ludicrous requirements to get to 30%-35%! Yeah right, if I'm getting 100+ depositors I'm really going to be promoting Ladbrokes! No serious affiliate is going to risk that now...


    Quote Originally Posted by deanimus View Post
    not only is it a poor % but also punishes those that have been promoting ladbrokes over the years and built up a decent player base.
    Yep - I've built up a fairly large player base, but I'm not bringing in many depositors at the moment, so this is going to really damage my income.
    Last edited by sweelinck; 23 January 2012 at 6:23 am.

  5. #25
    justbookies is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    September 2009
    Posts
    1,285
    Thanks
    522
    Thanked 863 Times in 512 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joeyl View Post
    Is it the norm now Uni? Not alot of affiliates seem bothered.
    This is a helluva long way from the norm, fortunately. Affiliates are and will be very bothered. Though the ones not too committed to Ladbrokes already will just reduce exposure and new affiliates won't bother with them at all.

  6. #26
    Rostick's Avatar
    Rostick is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    359
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 118 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    I like how they advertise it (ladbrokes, bewinners, party). "new exciting software, "fantastic program", "for the affiliates" and so on
    Betdistrict.com - free betting tips & previews
    Happybags.ro - romanian e-commerce website
    WW2HistoryBook - World War Two Library

  7. #27
    Voids is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    January 2012
    Posts
    626
    Thanks
    223
    Thanked 219 Times in 166 Posts

    Default

    Apparently Ladbrokes deem my site to have "unacceptable content" and have been unresponsive in answering what this is.

    I can't see a reason for me to continue my efforts with them. I think I'll stick the the other well known, better paying affiliates.

  8. #28
    Asim is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    December 2010
    Posts
    323
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked 164 Times in 111 Posts

    Default

    Wow thats is absolutely disgraceful terms. Much worse than belosers. Which genius in the ladbrokes affiliate department came up with this S***?!

    I cant see any reason, even for top affiliates, to promote them. Its to risky for your income. One month 25% comm. next month 15%... Sorry Ladbrokes aff. department, but we have bills to pay too, and we aint working for peanuts.

    Im pulling them from all my sites where theyre not up yet, and for future projects.... Those sites where they are up im considering to remove reviews etc. Simply not worth it to waste advitising space on a program like this....

    For some unknown reason I have ever done good with ladbrokes, so it would not hurt me much (thank god)... compared to other programs the conversion rate is very bad at laddies.

    Also the affiliate support at ladbrokes is almost non existing. You would perhaps get an answer to questions 1-2 months after you contacted them.

    The affilaite managers at bet365, unibet, Betsson, Betsafe, Nordicbet, Skybet etc. must be having a party these days. Ladbrokes banners/links is getting replaced by banners/links to their sites these days at many affiliates sites..

  9. #29
    baldidiot is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    January 2010
    Posts
    4,977
    Thanks
    427
    Thanked 2,271 Times in 1,510 Posts

    Default

    What about promoting ladbrokes through IA? There's been no mention of a change in commission structure and the back end is still reporting 25% base. Or do you think it's coming in time?
    onlinegamblingwebsites.com - Formally known as goodbonusguide.

    Gambling Domains: Small clear out of some of the domains we've been hoarding on Dan - see the list here. Prices negotiable, and willing to swap for decent links.

  10. #30
    iGamingWriter is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    752
    Blog Entries
    8
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by baldidiot View Post
    What about promoting ladbrokes through IA? There's been no mention of a change in commission structure and the back end is still reporting 25% base. Or do you think it's coming in time?
    For me that just screams of potential problems in the future. I'll continue to promote Ladbrokes in some far buried section of the site where they are unlikely to see any huge volume of traffic. It'd be weird not to have a review of Ladbrokes somewhere on a review site, but they'll get no premium positioning from me from this point on.

    ThePOGG
    iGamingContent.co.uk - Content writing services by some of the most experienced and knowledgeable writers in the sector.

    BetBlocker.org - Responsible Gambling charity providing free blocking software to everyone.

  11. #31
    SlotsAff is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2007
    Posts
    810
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Those terms are dreadful and I will not add them at all - why add Ladbrokes Casino for example when you have 32Red? (who also use Microgaming software) - 32Red (as of many) treat you right and are fair.

    I wouldn't like to be a Ladbrokes Affiliate Manager at the LAC later this week

  12. #32
    AmCan's Avatar
    AmCan is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    November 1999
    Location
    The Lost City of Atlantas
    Posts
    2,376
    Thanks
    242
    Thanked 326 Times in 161 Posts

    Default

    "Lifetime Payouts" but they get to change the commission rates on the players i've already sent them. I guess they feel it's ok to tell me "we pay X% for the life your players" then they can change X at will. Hey Ladbrokes are you planning on setting our "lifetime payouts" to 0% or maybe even -25% then try to force us to pay you for the privileged of funding your business?
    Last edited by AmCan; 24 January 2012 at 1:23 pm. Reason: translating to english.

  13. #33
    kwblue's Avatar
    kwblue is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2005
    Posts
    832
    Thanks
    404
    Thanked 679 Times in 262 Posts

    Default

    This change in commissions is quite atrocious and all affiliates need to pay attention to this move. We need to speak out about this and stop working with Ladbrokes, IMO, if they move forward with the commissions model changes. The post at AGD has already notified the Ladbrokes staff and every additional post notifies them as well. Let's speak to them and let them know that this is NOT RIGHT.

    https://www.affiliateguarddog.com/for...ade-t4849.html

    We are urging affiliates to talk with their banners and stop promoting Ladbrokes until which time they implement both a proper revshare agreement AND remove the retroactive nature of this change.

    Thanks for your time.

    Andy

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kwblue For This Useful Post:

    Engineer (24 January 2012), justbookies (25 January 2012)

  15. #34
    JackTenSuited is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2004
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 334 Times in 207 Posts

    Default

    If ladbrokes get rogued on sites such as casinomeister for this practise I'm sure it would make them take more notice!

  16. #35
    Engineer's Avatar
    Engineer is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2007
    Posts
    524
    Thanks
    488
    Thanked 437 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Reducing commission rates retroactively is not acceptable.

    Going forward (i.e. from the launch date of the new program), they can pay lower rates on new players if they want, but they definitely should not reduce commission rates on the existing players.

    Up until now, affiliates sent players to Ladbrokes with the understanding that 25% would always be the minimum earned on each player sent. It is very unethical (and possibly illegal) for Ladbrokes to change the contract in a way that benefits only them.

    Everyone, I strongly urge you to stand up against this. This sort of behavior can't be allowed by Ladbrokes or any other affiliate program.

  17. #36
    SlotsAff is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2007
    Posts
    810
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    I completely agree - I was considering adding them last week.

  18. #37
    pendil is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    April 2005
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts

    Default

    Thought Ladbrokes would be the least likely of gaming sites to treat affiliates this way.

    It looks like they imagine we are all going to push like mad to climb that commission ladder.

    Actually it will have exactly the opposite effect - why push Ladbrokes when you don't even know what the pay rate is ?

    Already took Ladbrokes off some of my best pages and getting new accounts where i never succeeded before.

    Still glad to have Ladbrokes on site,but no more promo pages or articles from me in the future.

  19. #38
    justbookies is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    September 2009
    Posts
    1,285
    Thanks
    522
    Thanked 863 Times in 512 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pendil View Post
    Thought Ladbrokes would be the least likely of gaming sites to treat affiliates this way.
    Why? They have left their affiliate program on rubbish outdated software for years, never answered emails and never embraced the concept. We do not even have an affiliate manager. They have simply gone through the motions by having an affiliate program just because other firms do, so it must be the thing to have. All the warning signs have been there that they do not value affiliate marketing. That is why they have never featured prominently on affiliate sites. It sort of explains why a company like Bet365 is growing hand over fist and making hay while The City is unhappy about Ladbrokes' online performance.

  20. #39
    pendil is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    April 2005
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justbookies View Post
    Why? They have left their affiliate program on rubbish outdated software for years, never answered emails and never embraced the concept. We do not even have an affiliate manager. They have simply gone through the motions by having an affiliate program just because other firms do, so it must be the thing to have. All the warning signs have been there that they do not value affiliate marketing. That is why they have never featured prominently on affiliate sites. It sort of explains why a company like Bet365 is growing hand over fist and making hay while The City is unhappy about Ladbrokes' online performance.
    Fair enough,its just that i have had some decent revs and no problems in the past.

    Mind you,anybody who goes out of their way to push Ladbrokes from now on must be a bit of a dimwit.

  21. #40
    F.C.Dosh's Avatar
    F.C.Dosh is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    November 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts

    Default

    Just got this from ladbrokesaffiliates :

    Dear Affiliate,

    <little bit cut out>

    Please see below our structure. Based on discussions and feedback from our affiliates, we believe that in this way we are better incentivising our Casino, Bingo, Games and Poker affiliates as we have improved the player sign up levels to reflect these products.

    As from today our default model will be as below, this model will not change for the remainder of 2012.

    Number of Players Commission
    Level 1 61+ 35%
    Level 2 21-60 30%
    Level 3 1-20 25%
    Level 4 0 15%


    Hurray for "discussions and feedback" I guess.
    Free Casino Dosh - The best deposit bonuses for online casinos, bingo, betting and poker sites
    g+ --- t --- f

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •