Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    AchingBones is offline New Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Exclamation How Crazy is the Australian Goverment! This is worth a read!

    Is this blog post too harsh? (Or fair!)

    https://www.onlinebetting.com.au/blog...live-odds.html

  2. #2
    Stephen F is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    November 2004
    Posts
    188
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 35 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    Personally I dont think the govt had any choice but to make a change. The constant advertising in front of kids had gone too far. Whilst I have no issues with the advertising in general, I dont think kids should be seeing it as openly as they were...

    Having said all that, sportsbetting is still only 15% of the total gambling spend by Australians, so it isnt actually resolving the bigger problems.

  3. #3
    JackTenSuited is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2004
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 334 Times in 207 Posts

    Default

    Why not just ban advertising of sports betting before 9pm like the UK?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to JackTenSuited For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    PlayHippo is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Should they not ban slot machines in public places such as bars /restaurants as well then? Or that is bringing in to much money to the state

  6. #5
    Stephen F is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    November 2004
    Posts
    188
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 35 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    I agree that it needs to be banned until 9-10pm, it will at least solve the major problem. Kids are definitely getting too relaxed with the concept of betting (which is the aim of the advertising). Moving it until later will help resolve that issue until they are old enough to understand.

    Re slot machines - it doesn't look like that will ever change now. Money talks here.

  7. #6
    rak's Avatar
    rak
    rak is offline Former AM
    Join Date
    January 2011
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,123
    Thanks
    250
    Thanked 334 Times in 258 Posts

    Default

    I don't think its too harsh at all.

    You just have to see how much gaming advertising is within a particular game itself, listed a few of the top of my head:

    sports team sponsorship
    in game stadium advertising
    running across the bottom of the screen
    during ad breaks
    segments named after betting companies
    during half time segment to talk about the current game odds

    And then 1 company spent a crap load of money which took advertising to the next level, and pretty much polarised everyone in saying "now its gone too far" . The company is Tom Waterhouse.

    - having the spokesman of the betting company, look and act like he was part of the commentary team talking about betting odds of tomorrows races
    - and then giving him a microphone so he was on the ground, talking about the odds he liked, looking like he was part of the commentary team.

    From what I understand, the big 4 sports betting companies in Australia have cemented themselves here. And to really break into the market, and be with that big group, you have to spend quite a bit money to get your name out there. What they have ended up doing is getting everyone to know their name, but maybe of the wrong reasons.

    The other sports betting companies have been pretty quiet about it all.

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to rak For This Useful Post:

    Anthony-Coral (29 May 2013), dfiocch (29 May 2013), Muppet (29 May 2013), RyanH (29 May 2013)

  9. #7
    AchingBones is offline New Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Have you thought of this?

    The thing is - can the television companies afford to lose the massive revenue?? How are the government going to compensate them!?!

  10. #8
    Stephen F is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    November 2004
    Posts
    188
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 35 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    That's always the big question, especially after these multi million dollar deals with the various sporting groups (to buy TV rights).

    I think as with tobacco it's their issue long term - they can sort it out.

    Stephen

  11. #9
    rak's Avatar
    rak
    rak is offline Former AM
    Join Date
    January 2011
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,123
    Thanks
    250
    Thanked 334 Times in 258 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AchingBones View Post
    The thing is - can the television companies afford to lose the massive revenue?? How are the government going to compensate them!?!
    Television can't afford to lose that advertising revenue. But from what I understand, TAB will be picking up the advertising after the TomWaterhouse deal breaks down. Government doesn't have to compensate them, its for the TV Stations, Sporting League and Advertisers to work out within the legal framework.

    The TW deal I think was a 5 year, 40 million a year deal? Something along those lines.

    I dont think gambling teams will be stopped from advertising or sponsoring teams, just no showing of odds.

  12. #10
    DaftDog's Avatar
    DaftDog is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2008
    Location
    Your kitchen.
    Posts
    2,068
    Thanks
    651
    Thanked 741 Times in 441 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AchingBones View Post
    The thing is - can the television companies afford to lose the massive revenue?? How are the government going to compensate them!?!
    The same thing was said when tobacco companies sponsored sports events, but the sports channels all survived.

  13. #11
    Muppet is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked 661 Times in 290 Posts

    Default

    Agree totally with Rak. The advertising on TV and in game has gone way beyond what any reasonable person would consider acceptable. When you have kids at a rugby league game asking a smarmy bookmaker (who also happens to be the son of a notorious crooked bookmaker who was banned from racetracks for over a decade and has a significant interest in the business) for his autograph after he has just done a half time talk on camera with the commentators on the sidelines of a game, you know that something is very wrong. That post linked is harsh and reads like a baby crying because someone took his rattle.

  14. #12
    LukeC is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    October 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    495
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 122 Times in 49 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanimus View Post
    Why not just ban advertising of sports betting before 9pm like the UK?
    In the UK you can advertise sports betting at any time if it is within a sports programme (which is where you'd want to feature live odds). The 9pm rule is just for non-sports programmes.
    Head of Affiliates at Digital Fuel

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •