Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    sveps is offline Brand New Member
    Join Date
    March 2024
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Post Is AI still good to be used on sites?

    Is AI content worth using after the latest google update?

  2. #2
    universal4's Avatar
    universal4 is online now Forum Administrator
    Join Date
    July 2003
    Location
    Courage is being scared to death...and saddling up anyway. John Wayne
    Posts
    31,789
    Thanks
    3,643
    Thanked 8,677 Times in 5,532 Posts

    Default

    Have you noticed that Google specifically stated they did not want sites to use AI?

    If you have a site that loses rank because you have AI generated content, we all certainly hope that using even more AI content will help.
    Google stated recently
    “Our long-standing spam policy has been that use of automation, including generative AI, is spam if the primary purpose is manipulating ranking in Search results. The updated policy is in the same spirit of our previous policy and based on the same principle. It’s been expanded to account for more sophisticated scaled content creation methods where it isn’t always clear whether low quality content was created purely through automation.”
    We have a thread discussing Google's latest update here
    https://www.dietistaktuellt.com/forum/massive-g...ng-266754.html

    Rick
    Universal4

  3. #3
    gamingmodern is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    195
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    You mentioned that-

    "If you have a site that loses rank because you have AI generated content, we all certainly hope that using even more AI content will help."


    Using more AI content will help? Are you sure..

    Please explain it little bit more ..

  4. #4
    universal4's Avatar
    universal4 is online now Forum Administrator
    Join Date
    July 2003
    Location
    Courage is being scared to death...and saddling up anyway. John Wayne
    Posts
    31,789
    Thanks
    3,643
    Thanked 8,677 Times in 5,532 Posts

    Default

    Sorry about that I worded that incorrectly and didn't catch the mistake, my apologies.
    It should have been worded,

    If you have a site that loses rank because you have AI generated content, why would you think or hope that using even more AI content will help?
    Google stated recently
    “Our long-standing spam policy has been that use of automation, including generative AI, is spam if the primary purpose is manipulating ranking in Search results. The updated policy is in the same spirit of our previous policy and based on the same principle. It’s been expanded to account for more sophisticated scaled content creation methods where it isn’t always clear whether low quality content was created purely through automation.”
    Rick
    Universal4

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to universal4 For This Useful Post:

    Cash Bonus (21 March 2024)

  6. #5
    casionmark is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    November 2016
    Posts
    439
    Thanks
    339
    Thanked 126 Times in 93 Posts

    Default

    It's not whether or not you used AI to produce the content that is important, its whether that content fits the requirements of Google's Helpful Content guidelines, and other guidelines.

    If you just use AI to produce 1,000s of articles and you don't sub-edit them to a decent standard and make sure they have value to a reader, you are going to suffer. Best use of AI in my opinion, and consensus seems to agree, is to research subjects and build first drafts. But you need to refine them before publishing. And always think about whose going to read it and whether it has value / use.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to casionmark For This Useful Post:

    bpmee (25 March 2024), universal4 (21 March 2024)

  8. #6
    Mattbar's Avatar
    Mattbar is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    July 2015
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,215
    Thanks
    108
    Thanked 835 Times in 516 Posts

    Default

    I agree. Google doesn't have anything against people using AI as a research tool, even coping and pasting elements. It is talking about people that use AI to generate thousands of pages to manipulate rankings.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Mattbar For This Useful Post:

    universal4 (21 March 2024)

  10. #7
    Cash Bonus's Avatar
    Cash Bonus is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4,915
    Thanks
    8,351
    Thanked 2,829 Times in 2,057 Posts

    Default

    It all depends on how you use AI. You obviously don't want to misuse it and then when Google find out about it, they give you a huge penalty for it. Definitely not worth it in the long run and nobody should take such silly risks at all.

  11. #8
    NoDepositCasinos's Avatar
    NoDepositCasinos is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    November 2022
    Location
    Colombia
    Posts
    583
    Thanks
    105
    Thanked 186 Times in 158 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by casionmark View Post
    It's not whether or not you used AI to produce the content that is important, its whether that content fits the requirements of Google's Helpful Content guidelines, and other guidelines.

    If you just use AI to produce 1,000s of articles and you don't sub-edit them to a decent standard and make sure they have value to a reader, you are going to suffer. Best use of AI in my opinion, and consensus seems to agree, is to research subjects and build first drafts. But you need to refine them before publishing. And always think about whose going to read it and whether it has value / use.
    I agree. It all comes down to how you use the tools you have at your disposal.

    Is AI worth using? For me, it's a 100% yes. The latest update from Google aims to reduce spam by discouraging lazy people who create high volumes of low-quality content in the hopes of manipulating rankings and earning a few bucks.

  12. #9
    CasinosBroker's Avatar
    CasinosBroker is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    July 2021
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    382
    Thanks
    68
    Thanked 92 Times in 81 Posts

    Default

    In my opinion, it's all about how you use AI tools.

    At the end of the day it's all about helping people with your content, from your website.
    Looking to buy or sell iGaming sites?
    Get in touch today!
    www.CasinosBroker.com
    WhatsApp: +40-757-953-988

  13. #10
    lapa221Q is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    33
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    AI content is a great tool for creating content that engages your audience and saves time as long as you use it responsibly.

  14. #11
    xecutable's Avatar
    xecutable is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2011
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    1,937
    Thanks
    571
    Thanked 1,190 Times in 689 Posts

    Default

    AI produces nothing. An AI is fed learning data beforehand, data that came from sites, sites that ACTUALLY produced it. Once it's trained the AI can give you the answers but it's all based on a third party produced data. How was that data obtained, in terms of the copyright law? Probably illegally.

    Beyond the point, let's be honest those so eager to use AI to "produce" content are either lazy, or unable to write and see it as the shortcut to success. And maybe it does work, for now that is. Essentially you are not "producing" anything, you are not improving at anything, and you are 1 update away from becoming obsolete.

    It's a tool to enhance your capabilities not replace them. And from what I see around here people want the replacement part not the enhancement part.

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to xecutable For This Useful Post:

    bpmee (26 March 2024), universal4 (26 March 2024)

  16. #12
    felipe_mcbr's Avatar
    felipe_mcbr is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    July 2024
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    It depends. Personally, I would never replace content written by a real person: it is much more authentic, with feelings, and it resonates better with the reader. But I'm not against using artificial intelligence to obtain relevant insights or help during a moment of creative block.

  17. #13
    AussiePunter is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    April 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 35 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    AI can be a tool used by experts, or a two year old. You'll get wildly different results from someone who knows how to write the correct prompt and somebody who knows nothing about AI at all.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •