Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Admin 20% fee

  1. #1
    bukpower is offline New Member
    Join Date
    February 2011
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Admin 20% fee

    Hello,

    Today I saw in my partner panel (Program Commission Structures), that Admin fee is set on 20%...
    Last month it was 0%, could you explain it?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Laura_Bognar's Avatar
    Laura_Bognar is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    January 2011
    Location
    Linz
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:HyphenationZone>21</w:HyphenationZone> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <wontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normale Tabelle"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> Hello,

    Thank you for your message - and sorry for the delayed answer!

    As you have seen correctly we had to update our general terms & conditions this year in some few points including the amount of the administration fee. We have informed our affiliates in the newsletter of February about these changes.



    Please be informed that the admin fee will be abstracted before the commission is calculated.
    If you wish to check your commission, please go to “Reports?tab and run “Earnings report?for specified time period. “Payment report?is another report that will show you the overview of your commission.


    If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.


    In any case thanks for your understanding.
    Best regards, Laura!

  3. #3
    bukpower is offline New Member
    Join Date
    February 2011
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Laura,
    Thank you for your reply. However, could you please advise what the reason of such decision is? As your partner I would like to know why you are going to deduct part of my earnings. Please note, that this fee may have negative impact on future cooperation with your company and all partners, considering your competitors. Is there any chance to cancel this charge or at least negotiate it level?


  4. #4
    Benitho is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    June 2003
    Location
    Sispony
    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Not good at all -just noticed that as well...

    Not a bewinners-like stunt (yet ?), but really not the way to do business. Tell us that in advance via a regular mail, not the newsletter and not after affiliates start noticing it...

    B.

  5. #5
    tryme's Avatar
    tryme is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    March 2009
    Posts
    306
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 135 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    What exactly is this fee for? 'Administration' is a pretty meaningless term, to be honest, so some transparency here would be much appreciated.

  6. #6
    Laura_Bognar's Avatar
    Laura_Bognar is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    January 2011
    Location
    Linz
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Hello and good morning everyone,

    First of all thank you very much for your feedback regarding the update of our terms & conditions. I can understand that such changes can raise confusion and insecurity. But please be informed that it wasn’t easy for the affiliate department to take these decisions. The mentioned administration fee was an indispensable step for the reorganization and improvement of our affiliate system, which includes i.e.


    • the support and service management (we want to offer you a fast and extensive communication, if there are i.e. questions about the payment process)
    • the assistance of our affiliate partners (we want you to be served with full attention by our affiliate service team)
    • the supply of an efficient affiliate system


    Regarding the date and the way we communicated the changes of our terms and conditions I somekind would like to agree: There could have been better ways. Nevertheless we decided to inform you via the newsletter as this communication channel simply reaches all our partners and is proved to be a very efficient way.

    So, to put it in a nutshell, in times of an increasing number of partners also the processing effort grows in a large scale. Therefore I only can hope that you will understand this development and that this won’t influence our so long successful cooperation.

    Best regards, Laura

  7. #7
    SlotsAff is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2007
    Posts
    810
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    BetAtHome is owned by Mangas - this fee is on the Expekt affiliate programme too I think.

    They should have been a lot more open about this in my opinion

  8. #8
    Benitho is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    June 2003
    Location
    Sispony
    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Thanks for noticing this, Christoff - Expekt takes 12% from Sportsbetting, even higher on Poker and Casino, but they do calculate that before the net hold, so it`s not that easy to detect.

    Anyone know how BetClic (another Mangas co.) handles this ?

    Tia
    B.

  9. #9
    tryme's Avatar
    tryme is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    March 2009
    Posts
    306
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 135 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    The mentioned administration fee was an indispensable step for the reorganization and improvement of our affiliate system, which includes i.e.


    • the support and service management (we want to offer you a fast and extensive communication, if there are i.e. questions about the payment process)
    • the assistance of our affiliate partners (we want you to be served with full attention by our affiliate service team)
    • the supply of an efficient affiliate system
    Hmm. Not impressed with this. It sounds to me like we, the affiliates, are effectively paying you to do your jobs.

  10. #10
    universal4's Avatar
    universal4 is offline Forum Administrator
    Join Date
    July 2003
    Location
    Courage is being scared to death...and saddling up anyway. John Wayne
    Posts
    31,788
    Thanks
    3,643
    Thanked 8,675 Times in 5,531 Posts

    Default

    As you have seen correctly we had to update our general terms & conditions this year in some few points including the amount of the administration fee. We have informed our affiliates in the newsletter of February about these changes.
    In other words, the agreements that affiliates made with you in the past has been changed....so you are not honoring exisiting agreements so what guarantee does any affiliate have that any current agreements will be honored in the future....

    Rick
    Universal4
    Gambling World Online Roulette Online Blackjack Live Online Games Sports Betting Horse Racing
    Casino Affiliate Programs
    Hosting and Domain Names
    Gambling Industry Association
    GPWA Moderation by Me and My Big Bad Security Self
    If an affiliate program is not small affiliate friendly (especially small US Affiliate), then they are NOT Affiliate Friendly!

  11. #11
    abscident's Avatar
    abscident is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    46
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    I have started a new thread that discusses the new changes in the Bet-at-home affiliate program terms. There is more robbery than you would think of. They slashed sub affiliate earnings to 30% of what they used to be, and they removed the no-negative carry over clause.

    Please continue the discussion here: https://www.dietistaktuellt.com/forum/new-affil...ry-195961.html
    Shark Poker - A poker portal
    Bookmakers Rankings - Best online sportsbooks
    Affiliate Program Ratings - Best affiliate programs
    Casinos Online Real Money - Online casinos for real money

  12. #12
    cassy is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    January 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Posts
    138
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    So this means that a lot of changes has been done with their T&C. IMO these terms would carry a negative affect for them as well as to their affilliates.

  13. #13
    artur81 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Did you guys receive commision in this month?
    I'm still waiting for it, and it's 23th.

  14. #14
    Laura_Bognar's Avatar
    Laura_Bognar is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    January 2011
    Location
    Linz
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:HyphenationZone>21</w:HyphenationZone> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <wontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normale Tabelle"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> Hey all,

    As I see, the changes in our Terms and Conditions still awake uncertainness, irritation, anger, fear? ?I can understand this. Changing decisions are always combined with those feelings. But these emotions appear on both sides, as well as on the affiliates, as on ours, as we still don’t know how things will evolve.

    The development of the bet-at-home.com affiliate program can be describes as a successful one - affiliates approve our principles of operation and are satisfied with the cooperation with bet-at-home.com andfortunatelythis number doesn’t stand still and new partners get in contact with us every day. This year the system reached a level, where an update of the Terms and Conditions simply had to be done, on the one hand because of the increasing number of affiliates and its growing processing effort (as I described before), on the other hand because of the changes within the affiliate marketing sector in general.

    For some affiliates, like abscident, the update of the T&C were far-reaching, but as I have to comment his reproaches, the reduction of his commission was not only based on changes in our Terms and Conditions.However in this case both parties know the history and this should not be discussed in public any longer.

    Regarding the future cooperation I only can repeat myself: I can hope that you will understand this development anyhow and that this won’t influence our so long successful partnership.



    For any further individual requests you can always contact me via [email protected], I’m sure a solution can be found for every problem.

    Regards, Laura

  15. #15
    Laura_Bognar's Avatar
    Laura_Bognar is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    January 2011
    Location
    Linz
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Hello Artur,

    I just sent you an Email regarding your requested payouts - if you have any further questions, just send me a message!

    Regards, Laura

  16. #16
    SlotsAff is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2007
    Posts
    810
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Changing T&Cs without prior warning is simply wrong.

    The admin fee story is rubbish in my opinion - if you have more affiliates, they Bet-At-Home would make more money hence would be able to hire more people to service the affiliates and affiliate programme.

    If you want to make changes, BAH is welcome to do so but it should be for new affiliates from a certain date onwards.

  17. #17
    yuro77 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    February 2011
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Not again!

    Ah well that's just great. After bwin went rogue, I started redirecting clicks from my sites from them to Bet-at-home. I will now be redirecting them again! I don't do business with crooked companies who introduce retroactive predatory terms, and I will be informing all of my contacts in the business to do the same!

    I work extremely hard to refer players to these sites. Changing T&Cs is fine, that's business, but do not apply them to existing referred players. Even if it's legal, it's absolutely unethical.

    Stick with the good guys who value the efforts of affiliates. In my experience Bet365 stand alone as the very best in that respect.

  18. #18
    bukpower is offline New Member
    Join Date
    February 2011
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Since BAH doesn’t want to change their mind, maybe we as their partners should protest and remove their banner as long as they don’t change their decision about 20% fee. What are your thoughts?

  19. #19
    abscident's Avatar
    abscident is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    46
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bukpower View Post
    Since BAH doesn’t want to change their mind, maybe we as their partners should protest and remove their banner as long as they don’t change their decision about 20% fee. What are your thoughts?
    I will certainly remove them this week. I have a lot of workload but I will still try to make some time to replace them on my sites.

    I hope all affiliates who see this will do the same, so that they will realize that such changes are harming them as well, not only the affiliates.
    Shark Poker - A poker portal
    Bookmakers Rankings - Best online sportsbooks
    Affiliate Program Ratings - Best affiliate programs
    Casinos Online Real Money - Online casinos for real money

  20. #20
    abscident's Avatar
    abscident is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    46
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laura_Bognar View Post
    <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:HyphenationZone>21</w:HyphenationZone> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <wontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normale Tabelle"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->For some affiliates, like abscident, the update of the T&C were far-reaching, but as I have to comment his reproaches, the reduction of his commission was not only based on changes in our Terms and Conditions.However in this case both parties know the history and this should not be discussed in public any longer.
    Well, I'm glad that you also know about my case. You should also notice that I only talked about the reduction caused directly by your change in T&C, which accounts for a 76% reduction.

    I never mentioned the "other" cause of my commission reduction, which accounts for another 80% drop.

    So yes, my commission dropped for two reasons, and they are now about 5% of what they used to be last month. If you think this means "lifetime revenue share", than we definitely can't agree on that.

    It's pretty hard to convince me that the changes are for the better since I get only 5% of what I used to earn previously, without doing anything wrong. Or maybe the only thing I did wrong was promoting you...

    I used to trust you as a partner, and referred you hundreds of affiliates, and this is what I get in response: a change in the T&C that slashes my commissions by 76% and another decision that crushes my commissions by another 80% (and of course nobody can give me any explanation about this second thing, because this is an internal issue that can't be discussed with me)...

    Just think about my situation, and try to put yourself in my position. What would you think? You get X commission every month, and all of a sudden you are told that you get 5% of X from now on... Should I be happy about this? Should I consider it for my own good? Is this ethical?
    Shark Poker - A poker portal
    Bookmakers Rankings - Best online sportsbooks
    Affiliate Program Ratings - Best affiliate programs
    Casinos Online Real Money - Online casinos for real money

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •